Delcid Elnora v. Burger King LLC, et al
Delcid Elnora |
Burger King, LLC, Ralph William Housh, Mgts., Brian Michael Dupree, Terry Tripp, Employee, Kenneth Alexander, also known as Kenny Wells, Sarah L. Goodman, Matt Carpenter, Mgts., Beth M. Huddleston, Larry, Employee and Gary Woodward |
21-3686 |
November 22, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
JUDGE ORDER: Denying [ # 5117369-2 ] motion to reopen the case filed by Appellant Delcid Elnora. Adp Dec 2021 [5118435] [21-3686] (BNW) [Entered: 01/19/2022 10:50 AM] |
MOTION to reopen the case, filed by Appellant Delcid Elnora w/service 01/14/2022 by USCA8. [5117369] [21-3686] (BNW) [Entered: 01/14/2022 11:25 AM] |
Tendered Motion to reopen appeal received from Appellant Delcid Elnora w/service 01/13/2022 [5117260] [21-3686] (MMH) [Entered: 01/14/2022 10:01 AM] |
MANDATE ISSUED. [5116539] [21-3686] (BNW) [Entered: 01/12/2022 09:41 AM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as it is untimely. The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Delcid Elnora is denied as moot [ # 5106086-2 ]. STEVEN M. COLLOTON, L. STEVEN GRASZ and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Dec 2021 [5110857] [21-3686] (BNW) [Entered: 12/22/2021 04:07 PM] |
MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Delcid Elnora w/service 12/03/2021. [5106086] [21-3686] (MMH) [Entered: 12/08/2021 04:55 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Barbara Anderson Lewis for Appellees Kenneth Alexander and Brian Michael Dupree w/service 11/24/2021 [5101461] [21-3686] (BAL) [Entered: 11/24/2021 11:04 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Thomas G. Fritz for Appellees Kenneth Alexander and Brian Michael Dupree w/service 11/24/2021 [5101457] [21-3686] (TGF) [Entered: 11/24/2021 11:01 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Thomas G. Fritz for Appellees Terry Tripp and Gary Woodward w/service 11/23/2021 [5101269] [21-3686] (TGF) [Entered: 11/23/2021 04:54 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Barbara Anderson Lewis for Appellees Terry Tripp and Gary Woodward w/service 11/23/2021 [5101266] [21-3686] (BAL) [Entered: 11/23/2021 04:52 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Judgment 9/20/21, and Order denying IFP 11/18/21 [5100364] [21-3686] (MMH) [Entered: 11/22/2021 11:32 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 12/20/2021, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5100367] [21-3686] (MMH) [Entered: 11/22/2021 11:35 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5100369] [21-3686] (MMH) [Entered: 11/22/2021 11:37 AM] |
Civil case docketed. [5100326] [21-3686] (MMH) [Entered: 11/22/2021 10:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.