James Nguyen v. Patricia Foley, et al
| James Van Nguyen |
| Patricia Foley, in her individual and official capacity, Jody Alholinna, in her individual and official capacity, Nancy Martin, in her individual and official capacity, Charli R. Vig, in his individual and official capacity, Keith B. Anderson, in his individual and official capacity, Rebecca Crooks-Stratton, in her individual and official capacity and Cole W. Miller, in his individual and official capacity |
| 21-3735 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT FILED - Appellant's Statement of Issues filed by Mr. James Van Nguyen in 21-3735, 21-3821 w/service 12/23/2021 by USCA8. [5111165] [21-3735, 21-3821] (ALK) [Entered: 12/23/2021 02:43 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - "Appellant's Method of Appendix Preparation Notice" filed by Mr. James Van Nguyen in 21-3735, 21-3821. w/service by USCA 12/22/2021 [Appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A are not required in pro se cases]. [5110666] [21-3735, 21-3821] (MVP) [Entered: 12/22/2021 12:44 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Appellant's Designation of the Record filed by Mr. James Van Nguyen in 21-3735, 21-3821 w/service 12/23/2021 by USCA8. [Appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A are not required in pro se cases]. [5110952] [21-3735, 21-3821] (BNW) [Entered: 12/23/2021 09:49 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5109755-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Appellant Mr. James Van Nguyen. Brief of James Van Nguyen due 02/17/2022 in 21-3735 [5109761] [21-3735, 21-3821] (MVP) [Entered: 12/20/2021 03:31 PM] |
| MOTION for 30-day extension of time to file brief, filed by Appellant Mr. James Van Nguyen in 21-3735, w/service by USCA8 12/20/2021. [5109755] [21-3735, 21-3821]--[Edited to correct docket text 12/20/2021 by MVP] (MVP) [Entered: 12/20/2021 03:25 PM] |
| CROSS APPEAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 01/18/2022. BRIEF OF APPELLANT James Van Nguyen due 01/18/2022.. Appellee/cross Appellant brief due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant's brief. [5106478] [21-3735, 21-3821]--[Edited 12/09/2021 by CBO] The briefing schedule with appendix was generated in error and has been locked. [5106478] [21-3735, 21-3821]--[Edited 12/13/2021 by CBO] (CBO) [Entered: 12/09/2021 02:34 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, opinion and order filed 10/27/2021, judgment filed 10/28/2021, and notice of appeal filed 11/24/2021. [5103095] [21-3735] (CBO) [Entered: 11/30/2021 04:56 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. Transcript due on or before 01/10/2022. BRIEF APPELLANT, James Van Nguyen due 01/24/2022 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5103099] [21-3735] (CBO) [Entered: 11/30/2021 04:59 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5103091] [21-3735] (CBO) [Entered: 11/30/2021 04:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
