Matthew Staszak v. John Yates
Matthew Staszak |
John P. Yates, Warden, FCC Forrest City |
21-3742 |
December 1, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BRIEF FILED - PRO SE APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Matthew Staszak, w/service 01/14/2022. Length: 23 pages (Copies: 5). The court has received and filed appellant's brief. Because no briefing schedule has been established, the appellant's brief is premature. Until a briefing schedule is established, no appellee responsive brief is due at this time. [5117465] [21-3742] (HAG) [Entered: 01/14/2022 01:50 PM] |
RECORD FILED - PRO SE APLNT/PET APPENDIX, 1 volume, Comments: 3 copies [5117468] [21-3742] (HAG) [Entered: 01/14/2022 01:53 PM] |
MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit filed by Party Mr. Matthew Staszak, w/service 12/13/2021. [5107120] [21-3742] (CJO) [Entered: 12/13/2021 08:03 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 12/08/2021, Denying Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [5106828] [21-3742] (CJO) [Entered: 12/10/2021 01:00 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5103300] [21-3742] (CJO) [Entered: 12/01/2021 10:33 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order of Dismissal 11/23/2021, and Judgment 11/23/2021.[5103283] [21-3742] (CJO) [Entered: 12/01/2021 10:25 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 12/22/2021, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5103295] [21-3742] (CJO) [Entered: 12/01/2021 10:30 AM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5103250] [21-3742] (CJO) [Entered: 12/01/2021 10:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Matthew Staszak v. John Yates | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Matthew Staszak | |
Represented By: | Matthew Staszak |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: John P. Yates, Warden, FCC Forrest City | |
Represented By: | Shannon S. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.