United States v. Luis Hernandez-Barajas
| United States of America |
| Luis Alberto Hernandez-Barajas |
| 21-3763 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 United States v. Luis Hernandez-Barajas
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Nova D. Janssen for Appellant Mr. Luis Alberto Hernandez-Barajas w/service 12/03/2021 [5104406] [21-3763] (NDJ) [Entered: 12/03/2021 10:28 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Torrie J. Schneider for Appellee United States of America w/service 12/02/2021 [5104211] [21-3763] (TJS) [Entered: 12/02/2021 05:55 PM] |
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 12/23/2021. Transcript due 12/23/2021. Brief of appellant Luis Alberto Hernandez-Barajas due 01/06/2022. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [5104083] [21-3763] (AEV) [Entered: 12/02/2021 02:21 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [5104081] [21-3763] (AEV) [Entered: 12/02/2021 02:18 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Judgment 11/18/21, docket entries, [5104070] [21-3763] (AEV) [Entered: 12/02/2021 02:02 PM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5104068] [21-3763] (AEV) [Entered: 12/02/2021 01:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
