Fredrick Graham v. Det. Gregory Klipsch
| St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, Sgt. Scego Unknown, Det. Matthew Manley, Det. Unknown O'Toole, P.O. K. Castillo, Brandon Wyms and Shariste Grandberry |
| Fredrick Ernest Graham |
| Det. Gregory Klipsch |
| 21-3772 |
| December 3, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Re-mailed correspondence - case opening letter , [ # 5104400-2 ], [ # 5104400-3 ], judgment dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction, [ # 5104564-2 ], [ # 5104564-3 ] and mandate to Mr. Fredrick Ernest Graham at AUSP Thomson. Attorney Insler called to report Graham has been relocated. [21-3772] (AEV) [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:27 AM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5104570] [21-3772] (CRJ) [Entered: 12/03/2021 02:46 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the notice of appeal as a petition for extraordinary writ of mandamus, the petition is denied. The full $505 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. Appellant will be permitted to pay the fee by the installment method contained in 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(b)(2). The district court on remand shall calculate the installments and collect the fees. The mandate shall issue forthwith. JAMES B. LOKEN, DUANE BENTON and JANE KELLY Adp Dec 2021 [5104564] [21-3772] (CRJ) [Entered: 12/03/2021 02:37 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 8/20/21, Order 11/30/21, docket entries, [5104412] [21-3772] (AEV) [Entered: 12/03/2021 10:36 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5104400] [21-3772] (AEV) [Entered: 12/03/2021 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
