JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Bryon Nevius, et al
| Midwest Land Management, LLC, Joseph W. Robey, David L. Robey and United States Internal Revenue Service |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| Bryon B. Nevius |
| 21-3873 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGE ORDER:Granting [ # 5114087-2 ] motion for extension of time to file rehearing filed by Appellant Mr. Bryon B. Nevius. Petition for rehearing due on 02/23/2022 Adp Dec 2021 [5119785] [21-3873] (CRJ) [Entered: 01/24/2022 09:54 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file petition for rehearing, filed by Appellant Mr. Bryon B. Nevius w/service by USCA8 01/04/2022. [5114087] [21-3873] (CRJ) [Entered: 01/04/2022 02:35 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as untimely. STEVEN M. COLLOTON, RALPH R. ERICKSON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Dec 2021 [5110976] [21-3873] (CRJ) [Entered: 12/23/2021 10:13 AM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank. - FOR CAL [5110820] [21-3873] (MMM) [Entered: 12/22/2021 03:35 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss case, filed by Attorney Ms. Michelle M. Masoner for Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank w/service 12/22/2021. [5110817] [21-3873] (MMM) [Entered: 12/22/2021 03:32 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Final Judgment and Foreclosure 12/10/20, docket entries, [5108798] [21-3873] (AEV) [Entered: 12/16/2021 10:45 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5108793] [21-3873] (AEV) [Entered: 12/16/2021 10:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
