Euclid Market Inc. v. United States
| Euclid Market Inc. |
| United States of America, through its Agency, the United States Department of Agriculture |
| 22-1301 |
| February 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Agriculture Acts |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Euclid Market Inc. v. United States
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECORD FILED - TRIAL TRANSCRIPT, 2 volumes, Comments: District Court documents #107 and #108 [Copies do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / EMSL, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 04/28/2021 - 04/29/2021, Court Reporter: Madden, Gayle D. [5143919] [22-1301] (STL) [Entered: 04/05/2022 08:59 AM] |
| Motion of Court Reporter Ms. Gayle D. Madden for extension of time to file transcript until 04/05/2022. w/service 03/11/2022 by USCA8. [5135727] [22-1301] (NDG) [Entered: 03/11/2022 02:01 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The motion for extension of time to file the transcript [ # 5135727-2 ] is granted. Transcript now due on 04/05/2022. Brief of Euclid Market Inc. due 04/15/2022. Appendix due on 04/15/2022 [5135728] [22-1301] (NDG) [Entered: 03/11/2022 02:05 PM] |
| DESIGNATION of record filed by Appellee United States of America. w/service 03/07/2022 [5133703] [22-1301] (KAS) [Entered: 03/07/2022 01:25 PM] |
| STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellant Euclid Market Inc. - w/service 02/24/2022. [5130315] [22-1301] (JLK) [Entered: 02/24/2022 11:35 AM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Euclid Market Inc. - Separate Appendix - w/service 02/24/2022 [5130314] [22-1301] (JLK) [Entered: 02/24/2022 11:34 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Jay L. Kanzler for Appellant Euclid Market Inc. w/service 02/22/2022 [5129612] [22-1301] (JLK) [Entered: 02/22/2022 04:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Karin A. Schute for Appellee United States of America w/service 02/11/2022 [5126849] [22-1301] (KAS) [Entered: 02/11/2022 03:20 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, memorandum opinion 12/14/22, judgment 12/14/22. [5126381] [22-1301] (CAH) [Entered: 02/10/2022 03:34 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 03/22/2022. Appendix due 04/01/2022. BRIEF APPELLANT, Euclid Market Inc. due 04/01/2022 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5126385] [22-1301] (CAH) [Entered: 02/10/2022 03:38 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5126379] [22-1301] (CAH) [Entered: 02/10/2022 03:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Euclid Market Inc. v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Euclid Market Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jay L. Kanzler Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: United States of America, through its Agency, the United States Department of Agriculture | |
| Represented By: | Karin A. Schute |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
