United States v. Gene Schave
| United States of America |
| Gene Paul Schave |
| 22-1305 |
| February 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:This criminal appeal involves child pornography. In accordance with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Section 3509(d)(2) regarding confidentiality of information and privacy protection, all papers filed with this court which disclose the name of or any information concerning a child shall be sealed. (SEE order for complete details) [5128592] [22-1305] (MMH) [Entered: 02/17/2022 11:22 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - SEALED PSI REPORT, 1 volumes, Comments: 1 volume, 3 copies of Sealed PSI Report, Addendums, and Statement of Reasons, Source Location: USDC / MN [5128473] [22-1305] (STL) [Entered: 02/17/2022 09:07 AM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5126559] [22-1305] (MMH) [Entered: 02/11/2022 10:10 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Judgment 2/9/22 [5126566] [22-1305] (MMH) [Entered: 02/11/2022 10:18 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [5126567] [22-1305] (MMH) [Entered: 02/11/2022 10:19 AM] |
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on 03/22/2022. PSI due 03/22/2022. Brief of appellant due on 04/05/2022. Appellee(s) brief due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Reply brief due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief.[5126573] [22-1305] (MMH) [Entered: 02/11/2022 10:24 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Douglas Olson for Appellant Gene Paul Schave w/service 02/11/2022 [5126598] [22-1305] (DO) [Entered: 02/11/2022 11:09 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - TRIAL TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Comments: Jury Selection - District Court document #105 [Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / MN, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 08/09/2021, No. of Pgs.: 224, Court Reporter: Willette, Timothy James [5126671] [22-1305] (STL) [Entered: 02/11/2022 12:26 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - SEALED TRANSCRIPT, 4 volumes, Comments: Trial Transcript - District Court documents #106, #107, #108, and #109 [Copies do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / MN, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 08/09/2021 - 08/12/2021, Court Reporter: Willette, Timothy James [5126673] [22-1305] (STL) [Entered: 02/11/2022 12:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Gene Schave | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Craig Raymond Baune |
| Represented By: | Miranda Dugi |
| Represented By: | Emily Anne Polachek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Gene Paul Schave | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Olson |
| Represented By: | Gene Paul Schave |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
