Neil Bergeson, Jr. v. State of South Dakota, et al
Neil Dennis Bergeson, Jr., a state citizen |
State of South Dakota, Judge Cullen Parker McNeece, Dylan Kirchmeirier, Jaden Carlson, Zac Angerhofer, Tyler Apple and South Dakota State Bar |
22-1318 |
February 14, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Neil Bergeson, Jr. v. State of South Dakota |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Jaden Carlson Appellant's reply brief deadline will be set, based on the Certificate of Service in appellee's paper brief. w/service 04/11/2022 , Length: 3,070 words 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Jaden Carlson due 04/18/2022 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs [5146586] [22-1318] (CMD) [Entered: 04/12/2022 11:28 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Catherine A. Seeley for Appellee Jaden Carlson w/service 04/11/2022 [5145845] [22-1318] (CAS) [Entered: 04/11/2022 08:32 AM] |
APPELLEE brief of Jaden Carlson submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5146277] [22-1318] (CAS) [Entered: 04/11/2022 04:32 PM] |
CORRECTED/INITIAL certificate of service for Appearance, Doc No. [ # 5142029-2 ], filed by Appellees Zac Angerhofer, Tyler Apple, Jaden Carlson, Dylan Kirchmeirier, Cullen Parker McNeece, South Dakota State Bar, State of South Dakota and Appellant Mr. Neil Dennis Bergeson, Jr. [5142970] [22-1318] (GSP) [Entered: 04/01/2022 11:23 AM] |
Paper copies Appellee/Respondent brief, [ # 5141291-2 ] filed by Cullen Parker McNeece, South Dakota State Bar and State of South Dakota 10 paper copies received. Reply brief of Neil Dennis Bergeson Jr. due 04/19/2022. [5142504] [22-1318] (HAG) [Entered: 03/31/2022 11:53 AM] |
PUBLIC DOCKET NOTE: Not all appellees have filed their briefs in this case. The reply brief deadline of April 19, 2022, has been terminated and will be reestablished once all appellee briefs have been filed. [5142510] [22-1318] (HAG) [Entered: 03/31/2022 11:57 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Greg S Paulson for Appellee Jaden Carlson w/service 03/30/2022 [5142029] [22-1318] (GSP) [Entered: 03/30/2022 01:42 PM] |
BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Cullen Parker McNeece, South Dakota State Bar and State of South Dakota, Appellant's reply brief deadline will be set, based on the Certificate of Service in the last appellee's paper brief. w/service 03/28/2022 , Length: 2,910 words 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Cullen Parker McNeece, South Dakota State Bar and State of South Dakota due 04/04/2022 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs [5141291] [22-1318] (CMD) [Entered: 03/29/2022 09:56 AM] |
Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Robert B. Anderson for Appellees State of South Dakota, South Dakota State Bar and Cullen Parker McNeece. [5140994] [22-1318] (CMD) [Entered: 03/28/2022 02:13 PM] |
APPELLEE brief of South Dakota State Bar, State of South Dakota and Cullen Parker McNeece submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5141060] [22-1318] (RBA) [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:23 PM] |
APPELLEE brief of Cullen Parker McNeece, South Dakota State Bar and State of South Dakota submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5140747] [22-1318] (RBA) [Entered: 03/28/2022 09:09 AM] |
PUBLIC DOCKET NOTE: Not all appellees have filed their briefs in this case. The reply brief deadline of April 6, 2022, has been terminated and will be reestablished once all appellee briefs have been filed. [5140234] [22-1318] (CMD) [Entered: 03/24/2022 01:40 PM] |
Paper copies Appellee/Respondent brief, [ # 5137297-2 ] filed by Zac Angerhofer, Tyler Apple and Dylan Kirchmeirier 10 copies paper copies received. Reply brief of Neil Dennis Bergeson Jr. due 04/06/2022 [5138614] [22-1318] (CMD) [Entered: 03/21/2022 11:41 AM] |
APPELLEE brief of Zac Angerhofer, Tyler Apple and Dylan Kirchmeirier submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5136940] [22-1318] (JKF) [Entered: 03/16/2022 08:10 AM] |
BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Zac Angerhofer, Tyler Apple and Dylan Kirchmeirier, Appellant's reply brief deadline will be set, based on the Certificate of Service in the last appellee's paper brief. w/service 03/16/2022 , Length: 1,531 words 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Zac Angerhofer, Tyler Apple and Dylan Kirchmeirier due 03/21/2022 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs [5137297] [22-1318] (CMD) [Entered: 03/16/2022 01:45 PM] |
ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Mr. Neil Dennis Bergeson, Jr. , w/service by USCA8 03/11/2022 [5135739] [22-1318] (CMD) [Entered: 03/11/2022 02:33 PM] |
BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Neil Dennis Bergeson, Jr.. w/service 03/11/2022 , Length: 3 pages Brief of Zac Angerhofer, Tyler Apple, Jaden Carlson, Dylan Kirchmeirier, Cullen Parker McNeece, South Dakota State Bar and State of South Dakota due on 04/11/2022 [5135735] [22-1318] (CMD) [Entered: 03/11/2022 02:26 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Marty J. Jackley for Appellee Jaden Carlson w/service 03/04/2022 [5133068] [22-1318] (MJJ) [Entered: 03/04/2022 10:27 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Joshua Finer for Appellees Zac Angerhofer, Tyler Apple and Dylan Kirchmeirier w/service 02/18/2022 [5129007] [22-1318] (JKF) [Entered: 02/18/2022 01:59 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Robert B. Anderson for Appellees Cullen Parker McNeece, South Dakota State Bar and State of South Dakota w/service 02/17/2022 [5128762] [22-1318] (RBA) [Entered: 02/17/2022 04:36 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order of 1/25/2022, Judgment of 1/25/2022, and docket entries, [5127393] [22-1318] (ASL) [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:55 PM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Neil Dennis Bergeson Jr. due 03/28/2022. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5127398] [22-1318] (ASL) [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:59 PM] |
Civil case docketed. [5127386] [22-1318] (ASL) [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.