Feliciano Lopez-Castillo v. United States
Feliciano Lopez-Castillo |
United States of America |
22-1371 |
February 18, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition Response of United States of America due 03/08/2022 (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Mr. Feliciano Lopez-Castillo w/service 02/10/2022. [5129420] [22-1371] (MMH) [Entered: 02/22/2022 12:43 PM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5129417] [22-1371] (MMH) [Entered: 02/22/2022 12:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Feliciano Lopez-Castillo v. United States | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Feliciano Lopez-Castillo | |
Represented By: | Feliciano Lopez-Castillo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Thomas More Hollenhorst |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.