Daniel Gomez v. Minnehaha Co. State's Attorney Office
| Daniel Jose Gomez |
| Minnehaha County State's Attorney Office |
| 22-1470 |
| March 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Daniel Gomez v. State of South Dakota |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Daniel Jose Gomez. w/service by USCA8 04/11/2022 , Length: 16 pages, Copies: 5 Brief of Minnehaha County State's Attorney Office due on 05/11/2022 [5146181] [22-1470] (MVP) [Entered: 04/11/2022 02:59 PM] |
| JUDGE ORDER: Denying [ # 5141308-2 ] motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Jose Gomez. Adp May 2022 [5141802] [22-1470] (MVP) [Entered: 03/30/2022 09:51 AM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel with attachments, filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Jose Gomez w/service by USCA8 03/29/2022. [5141308] [22-1470] (MVP) [Entered: 03/29/2022 10:12 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Claire E. Wilka for Appellee Minnehaha County State's Attorney Office w/service 03/14/2022 [5136059] [22-1470] (CEW) [Entered: 03/14/2022 11:32 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by William C. Garry for Appellee Minnehaha County State's Attorney Office w/service 03/11/2022 [5135520] [22-1470] (WCG) [Entered: 03/11/2022 09:30 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, opinion and order filed 2/22/2022, judgment filed 2/22/2022, notice of appeal filed 3/2/2022, and order granting IFP/PLRA filed 3/3/2022. [5133700] [22-1470] (CBO) [Entered: 03/07/2022 01:23 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Daniel Jose Gomez due 04/18/2022. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5133780] [22-1470] (CBO) [Entered: 03/07/2022 02:48 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5133696] [22-1470] (CBO) [Entered: 03/07/2022 01:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Daniel Gomez v. Minnehaha Co. State's Attorney Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Daniel Jose Gomez | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Jose Gomez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Minnehaha County State's Attorney Office | |
| Represented By: | William C. Garry |
| Represented By: | Claire E. Wilka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
