Andrew Devisme v. City of Duluth, et al
| Andrew Devisme |
| City of Duluth and HRA |
| 22-1572 |
| March 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Accommodation |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEF FILED - PRO SE APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Andrew Devisme. w/service by USCA8 05/06/2022 , Length: 7 pages, 5 copies Brief of City of Duluth and HRA due on 06/06/2022 [5155074] [22-1572] (CRJ) [Entered: 05/06/2022 01:28 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent attaching pro se document. [5138198] [22-1572] (MMH) [Entered: 03/18/2022 12:31 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Andrew Devisme due 04/27/2022. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5138104] [22-1572] (MMH) [Entered: 03/18/2022 10:27 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Judgment 2/22/22 [5138101] [22-1572] (MMH) [Entered: 03/18/2022 10:26 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5138094] [22-1572] (MMH) [Entered: 03/18/2022 10:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
