Ryan Edner v. Michelle Dietrich, et al
| Ryan C. Edner and Ryan Christopher Edner |
| Michelle Dietrich, Judicial Officer, Cecil Naatz, Attorney, Jacob Birkholz, Attorney, Zachary Webster, Attorney and Birkholz Law Firm |
| 22-1664 |
| March 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5192764] [22-1664] (CNL) [Entered: 08/30/2022 09:58 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Ryan Edner appeals an interlocutory order entered by the district court in this 42 U.S.C. 1983 action against the trial judge and numerous other defendants involved in Mr. Edners pending state court criminal case. We summarily affirm the dismissal without prejudice of his claims for injunctive relief for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. Rule 47A(a). To the extent Mr. Edner appeals other parts of the courts order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We strike the amended notice of appeal Mr. Edner filed on July 19, 2022 as untimely, improper, and scandalous. JAMES B. LOKEN, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Aug 2022 [5185653] [22-1664] (CNL) [Entered: 08/09/2022 02:08 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Raymond W. Gruender, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5185650] [22-1664] (CNL) [Entered: 08/09/2022 02:06 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of 2d amended notice of appeal, docket entries. [5178557] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 07/19/2022 11:42 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 07/01/2022 granting motion for IFP [5173585] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 07/01/2022 03:12 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 22-1664: In Forma Pauperis] [5173586] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 07/01/2022 03:13 PM] |
| RESPONSE in support of clerk order to show cause for failure to pay docket fee [ # 5149973-2 ] filed by Appellant Ryan C. Edner, w/service 05/02/2022. [5154340] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 05/04/2022 04:42 PM] |
| Tendered Response to Show Cause Order received from Appellant Ryan C. Edner [5154212] [22-1664] (CNL) [Entered: 05/04/2022 02:43 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The show cause order of 4/22/22 is hereby dissolved. Appellant has moved for IFP in district court as directed in this court's order dated March 30, 2022. [5154344] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 05/04/2022 04:45 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Ryan C. Edner due 05/06/2022 [5149973] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 04/22/2022 01:53 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of Amended Notice of Appeal. [5147108] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 04/13/2022 02:26 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of court order of 04/11/2022 denying motion for extension as moot. [5146160] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 04/11/2022 02:45 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5141958] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 03/30/2022 12:39 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Order for dismissal 2/24/22 (including denial of IFP). Also, this is an interlocutory and non-service appeal. [5141966] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 03/30/2022 12:47 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/20/2022, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5141969] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 03/30/2022 12:49 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5141972] [22-1664] (MMH) [Entered: 03/30/2022 12:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
