Lawrence Martin v. Dexter Payne
Lawrence Martin |
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections |
22-1693 |
April 4, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Mr. Lawrence Martin, w/service 04/04/2022. Response of Dexter Payne due 04/18/2022. [5143594] [22-1693] (CJO) [Entered: 04/04/2022 02:23 PM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5143575] [22-1693] (CJO) [Entered: 04/04/2022 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Lawrence Martin v. Dexter Payne | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Lawrence Martin | |
Represented By: | Lawrence Martin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections | |
Represented By: | David L. Eanes Jr. |
Represented By: | Karen Virginia Wallace |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.