United States v. Kevin Kerr
United States of America |
Kevin Kerr |
22-1694 |
April 4, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 05/31/2022. Appendix due 06/10/2022. BRIEF APPELLANT, Kevin Kerr due 06/10/2022 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5149705] [22-1694] (AEV) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:46 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: This case was held in abeyance pending this court's decision in United States v. Timothy O'Laughlin, No. 21-1611. No. 21-1611 has been decided. This case is removed from abeyance status and a briefing schedule will be entered. [5149697] [22-1694] (AEV) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:36 PM] |
Re-mailed correspondence - case opening letter , [ # 5143795-2 ], returned from MEDICAL CENTER for FED PRISONERS, remailed with clerk order appoint federal public defender, [ # 5144806-2 ], to Mr. Kevin Kerr at USP - ALLENWOOD [ # 5144806-3 ] [22-1694] (AEV) [Entered: 04/14/2022 03:18 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5146815-2 ] the motion to seal. The Court is hereby sealing the following: the Motion to stay the briefing schedule and Granting [ # 5146811-2 ] motion to stay the briefing schedule, filed by Mr. David Randolph Mercer for Appellant Mr. Kevin Kerr. [5146852] [22-1694] (AEV) [Entered: 04/12/2022 04:29 PM] |
MOTION to seal previously filed Motion to stay briefing schedule, filed by Attorney Mr. David Randolph Mercer for Appellant Mr. Kevin Kerr w/service 04/08/2022. [5146815] [22-1694] (AEV) [Entered: 04/12/2022 03:44 PM] |
MOTION to stay briefing schedule, filed by Attorney Mr. David Randolph Mercer for Appellant Mr. Kevin Kerr w/service 04/08/2022. [5146811] [22-1694] (AEV) [Entered: 04/12/2022 03:39 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by David R. Mercer for Appellant Mr. Kevin Kerr w/service 04/06/2022 [5144831] [22-1694] (DRM) [Entered: 04/06/2022 03:28 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [5144806] [22-1694] (AEV) [Entered: 04/06/2022 02:52 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Cynthia J. Hyde for Appellee United States of America w/service 04/05/2022 [5143924] [22-1694] (CJH) [Entered: 04/05/2022 09:01 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Motion for Discharge from Civil Commitment 3/21/22, Order 3/22/22, docket entries, [5143798] [22-1694] (AEV) [Entered: 04/04/2022 04:39 PM] |
Civil case docketed. [5143795] [22-1694] (AEV) [Entered: 04/04/2022 04:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: United States v. Kevin Kerr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Cynthia Jean Hyde |
Represented By: | Shane Patrick McCullough |
Represented By: | Kacey Tilley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Kevin Kerr | |
Represented By: | Kevin Kerr |
Represented By: | David Randolph Mercer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.