Steven Cody v. John Hudson, et al
Steven Donnelle Cody, also known as Steven Cody-Obama |
John Hudson, Corporal, Varner Supermax, ADC, Washington, Lieutenant, Varner Supermax, ADC, Brandon Carnell, Deputy Warden (Former Major), Varner Supermax, ADC and James Gibson, Warden, Varner Supermax, ADC |
22-1729 |
April 7, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MANDATE ISSUED. [5156658] [22-1729] (MVP) [Entered: 05/12/2022 08:17 AM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Duane Benton, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5149701] [22-1729] (MVP) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:40 PM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - This appeal is dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or demonstrate eligibility to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(g). The pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied [ # 5148368-2 ]. The full $505 appellate filing and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. The court remands the collection of those fees to the district court. JAMES B. LOKEN, DUANE BENTON and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Apr 2022 [5149704] [22-1729] (MVP) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:43 PM] |
MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Party Mr. Steven Donnelle Cody w/service 04/18/2022. [5148368] [22-1729] (CAH) [Entered: 04/18/2022 03:43 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5145257] [22-1729] (CAH) [Entered: 04/07/2022 02:46 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order 3/31/22, judgment 3/31/22, order 4/7/22. [5145252] [22-1729] (CAH) [Entered: 04/07/2022 02:41 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:The District Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 05/09/2022 [5145255] [22-1729] (CAH) [Entered: 04/07/2022 02:43 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5145249] [22-1729] (CAH) [Entered: 04/07/2022 02:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.