Robert Davis, Jr. v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corp.
Robert L. Davis, Jr., TTEE |
Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, agent of Mary Leigh Phillips CEO |
22-1755 |
April 12, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOCUMENT FILED - entitled Petition for Review filed by Mr. Robert L. Davis, Jr.. w/service 05/31/2022 [5162874] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:54 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:Corporate Disclosure filed by Appellee Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation in 22-1755 , [ # 5148838-2 ], response filed by Mr. Robert L. Davis, Jr. in 22-1755 , [ # 5149208-2 ], reply filed by Appellee Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation in 22-1755 , [ # 5162041-2 ] are hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5162216] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 05/27/2022 11:34 AM] |
REPLY to objection to corporate disclosure statement [ # 5149208-2 ] filed by Appellee Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation w/service 05/27/2022. [5162041] [22-1755] - FOR CAL (AMR) [Entered: 05/27/2022 09:16 AM] |
DOCUMENT FILED - entitled Petition for Review filed by Mr. Robert L. Davis, Jr.. w/service 05/31/2022 [5162878] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:56 PM] |
DOCUMENT FILED - Writ of Execution filed by Mr. Robert L. Davis, Jr.. w/service 05/19/2022 [5159386] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 05/19/2022 03:33 PM] |
CLERK LETTER sent to file a reply to response in opposition to, [ # 5149208-2 ], Corporate Disclosure , [ # 5148838-2 ]. [5157156] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 05/13/2022 10:36 AM] |
UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 22-1755: pending] [5150631] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 04/26/2022 09:02 AM] |
RESPONSE in opposition to Corporate Disclosure [ # 5148838-2 ], ] filed by Party Mr. Robert L. Davis, Jr., w/service 04/20/2022. [5149208] [22-1755] - FOR CAL (CAH) [Entered: 04/20/2022 02:20 PM] |
CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation. - FOR CAL [5148838] [22-1755] (AMR) [Entered: 04/19/2022 04:16 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Anna-Katrina S. Christakis for Appellee Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation w/service 04/19/2022 [5148835] [22-1755] (ASC) [Entered: 04/19/2022 04:09 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Alan Ritchie for Appellee Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation w/service 04/19/2022 [5148823] [22-1755] (AMR) [Entered: 04/19/2022 03:52 PM] |
DOCUMENT FILED - Demand for Validation of Subscribed Oath of Office filed by Mr. Robert L. Davis, Jr.. w/service 04/18/2022 [5148385] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 04/18/2022 03:54 PM] |
DOCUMENT FILED entitled Petition for Review, with attachments, filed by Mr. Robert L. Davis, Jr.. w/service 04/18/2022 [5148167] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 04/18/2022 11:16 AM] |
MOTION for entry of Summary Judgment (entitled Petition for Review), filed by Appellant Mr. Robert L. Davis, Jr. w/service 04/13/2022. [5146926] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 04/13/2022 09:15 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order 4/4/22, docket text order 4/11/22, judgment 4/11/22. [5146469] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 04/12/2022 10:04 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 05/10/2022, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5146470] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 04/12/2022 10:05 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5146473] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 04/12/2022 10:06 AM] |
MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Robert L. Davis, Jr. w/service 04/12/2022. [5146624] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 04/12/2022 12:06 PM] |
Civil case docketed. [5146466] [22-1755] (CAH) [Entered: 04/12/2022 10:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Robert Davis, Jr. v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corp. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Robert L. Davis, Jr., TTEE | |
Represented By: | Robert L. Davis Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, agent of Mary Leigh Phillips CEO | |
Represented By: | Anna-Katrina S. Christakis |
Represented By: | Patrick A. Huber |
Represented By: | Alan M. Ritchie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.