Justin Gardner v. State of Nebraska
Petitioner / Appellant: Justin Gardner
Respondent / Appellee: State of Nebraska
Case Number: 22-1768
Filed: April 14, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2022 JUDGMENT FILED - Appellant has failed to respond to the show cause order and the time for a response has expired. This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [5166133] [22-1768] (CNL) [Entered: 06/09/2022 12:44 PM]
June 9, 2022 MANDATE ISSUED. [5166138] [22-1768] (CNL) [Entered: 06/09/2022 12:48 PM]
May 18, 2022 CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees in cases #22-1768, 22-1769, 22-1770, 22-1771, and 22-1773. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Justin Gardner due 06/01/2022. [5158899] [22-1768, 22-1769, 22-1770, 22-1771, 22-1773] (CJO) [Entered: 05/18/2022 02:38 PM]
April 14, 2022 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5147194] [22-1768] (CJO) [Entered: 04/14/2022 07:40 AM]
April 14, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum and Order 05/08/2019, Judgment 05/08/2019, 8th Circuit Judgment 03/14/2022, and Memorandum and Order 04/12/2022. [5147192] [22-1768] (CJO) [Entered: 04/14/2022 07:38 AM]
April 14, 2022 CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 05/12/2022, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5147193] [22-1768] (CJO) [Entered: 04/14/2022 07:39 AM]
April 14, 2022 Prisoner case docketed. [5147189] [22-1768] (CJO) [Entered: 04/14/2022 07:31 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Justin Gardner v. State of Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Justin Gardner
Represented By: Justin Gardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: State of Nebraska
Represented By: Erin Elizabeth Tangeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?