Trimark Hotel Corporation v. IUOE
| Trimark Hotel Corporation, a Texas corporation |
| International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 70 |
| 22-1836 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Labor/Management Relations |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5164330-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Bruce Jay Douglas. Brief of Trimark Hotel Corporation due 07/14/2022. Appendix due on 07/14/2022. [5164392] [22-1836] (NDG) [Entered: 06/03/2022 03:42 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 07/14/2022, filed by Attorney Mr. Bruce Jay Douglas for Appellant Trimark Hotel Corporation w/service 06/03/2022. [5164330] [22-1836] (BJD) [Entered: 06/03/2022 02:06 PM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Trimark Hotel Corporation - Joint Appendix - w/service 05/09/2022 [5155510] [22-1836] (BJD) [Entered: 05/09/2022 01:50 PM] |
| STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellant Trimark Hotel Corporation - w/service 05/09/2022. [5155511] [22-1836] (BJD) [Entered: 05/09/2022 01:53 PM] |
| DESIGNATION of record filed by Appellant Trimark Hotel Corporation. w/service 05/09/2022 [5155527] [22-1836] (MVP) [Entered: 05/09/2022 02:15 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellant Trimark Hotel Corporation. - FOR CAL [5155508] [22-1836] (BJD) [Entered: 05/09/2022 01:48 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Nicolas R. Kaylor for Appellee IUOE w/service 04/27/2022 [5151159] [22-1836] (NRK) [Entered: 04/27/2022 09:13 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Timothy J. Louris for Appellee IUOE w/service 04/27/2022 [5151124] [22-1836] (TJL) [Entered: 04/27/2022 08:32 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Bruce J. Douglas for Appellant Trimark Hotel Corporation w/service 04/26/2022 [5150947] [22-1836] (BJD) [Entered: 04/26/2022 02:13 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, order filed 3/23/2022, judgment filed 3/24/2022, and notice of appeal filed 4/22/2022. [5150239] [22-1836] (CBO) [Entered: 04/25/2022 10:41 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 06/06/2022. Appendix due 06/14/2022. BRIEF APPELLANT, Trimark Hotel Corporation due 06/14/2022 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5150243] [22-1836] (CBO) [Entered: 04/25/2022 10:43 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5150233] [22-1836] (CBO) [Entered: 04/25/2022 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Trimark Hotel Corporation v. IUOE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Trimark Hotel Corporation, a Texas corporation | |
| Represented By: | Bruce Jay Douglas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 70 | |
| Represented By: | Nicolas R. Kaylor |
| Represented By: | Timothy J. Louris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
