United States v. John Winer
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: John Rick Winer
Case Number: 22-1869
Filed: April 27, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 9, 2023 United States v. John Winer

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2022 CLERK ORDER: Granting [ # 5173086-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Appellant John Rick Winer. Brief of John Rick Winer due 08/05/2022 [5173093] [22-1869] (CNL) [Entered: 06/30/2022 01:31 PM]
June 30, 2022 MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 08/05/2022, filed by Appellant John Rick Winer w/service by USCA8 on 06/30/2022. [5173086] [22-1869] (CNL) [Entered: 06/30/2022 01:29 PM]
June 15, 2022 RECORD FILED - SEALED PSI REPORT, 1 volumes, Comments: 1 volume, 3 copies of Sealed PSI Report, Addendum, Recommended Spercial Conditions, and Statement of Reasons, Source Location: USDC / SD [5167809] [22-1869] (STL) [Entered: 06/15/2022 09:51 AM]
June 14, 2022 RECORD FILED - TRIAL TRANSCRIPT, 7 volumes, Comments: District Court documents #319, #320, #321, #322, #323, #324, and #325 [Only Electronic Copy Received - No Paper Copy on File], Source Location: USDC / SD, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 11/15/2021 - 11/23/2021, Court Reporter: Dedula, Carla F. [5167236] [22-1869] (STL) [Entered: 06/14/2022 07:55 AM]
June 14, 2022 RECORD FILED - HEARING TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Comments: Pretrial Conference - District Court document #344 [Only Electronic Copy Received - No Paper Copy on File], Source Location: USDC / SD, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 11/12/2021, No. of Pgs.: 35, Court Reporter: Not Help Him, Sheri L. [5167235] [22-1869] (STL) [Entered: 06/14/2022 07:47 AM]
June 14, 2022 RECORD FILED - SENTENCING TRANS, 1 volumes, Comments: District Court document #350 [Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / SD, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 04/18/2022, No. of Pgs.: 80, Court Reporter: Dedula, Carla F. [5167237] [22-1869]--[Edited 06/14/2022 by STL] (STL) [Entered: 06/14/2022 07:59 AM]
June 6, 2022 DOCUMENT FILED - Motion to proceed pro se filed by John Rick Winer. w/service by USCA on 06/06/2022. No action taken. Duplicate of Motion to proceed pro se filed on June 1, 2022 [5163613]. Judge order granting the motion and establishing pro se briefing schedule [5164043] entered on June 3, 2022 has been mailed to the appellant. [5164991] [22-1869] (CNL) [Entered: 06/07/2022 09:30 AM]
June 3, 2022 JUDGE ORDER: The court has construed appellants pleading of May 20, 2022, as a motion to remove his appointed counsel and proceed pro se [ # 5163613-2 ]. The motion is granted, and Mr. Jamie L. Damon is relieved of his Criminal Justice Act appointment in the appeal. The case will proceed pro se. The following pro se briefing schedule is established: Transcripts - June 6, 2022 Appellants Opening Brief - July 6, 2022 Appellees Brief - 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellants brief Appellants Reply Brief - 14 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellees brief. Appellant is reminded that his opening brief is limited to 30 pages and that his reply brief is limited to 15 pages. See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(a)(7)(A). Permission to file an overlength brief is not routinely granted. See attached order for further details. Adp June 2022--[Edited 06/03/2022 by CNL] NDA RESENT WITH REVISED ORDER ATTACHED CORRECTING TYPO [5164043] [22-1869]--[Edited 06/03/2022 by CNL]TYPO CORRECTED IN DOCKET TEXT (CNL) [Entered: 06/03/2022 08:47 AM]
June 1, 2022 MOTION to proceed pro se, filed by Appellant John Rick Winer w/service by USCA8 on 06/01/2022. [5163613] [22-1869] (CNL) [Entered: 06/02/2022 09:17 AM]
April 27, 2022 CRIMINAL case docketed. [5151380] [22-1869] (MMH) [Entered: 04/27/2022 12:14 PM]
April 27, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Judgment 4/20/22 [5151385] [22-1869] (MMH) [Entered: 04/27/2022 12:21 PM]
April 27, 2022 CLERK ORDER: Appointing Ms. Jamie L. Damon for John Rick Winer under the Criminal Justice Act. [5151396] [22-1869] (MMH) [Entered: 04/27/2022 12:34 PM]
April 27, 2022 CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on 06/06/2022. PSI due 06/06/2022. Brief of appellant due on 06/21/2022. Appellee(s) brief due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Reply brief due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief.[5151401] [22-1869] (MMH) [Entered: 04/27/2022 12:38 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States v. John Winer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Ann Marie Hoffman
Represented By: Jeremy Robert Jehangiri
Represented By: Connie Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: John Rick Winer
Represented By: Jamie L. Damon
Represented By: John Rick Winer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?