Micah Riggs v. Robert Gibbs, et al
Defendant: David Barbour, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual, Michael Feagans, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual, Alan Whaley, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual and Brad Dumit, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual
Plaintiff / Appellant: Micah B. Riggs
Defendant / Appellee: Robert Gibbs, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual, Chris Onik, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual, Teddy Taylor, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual and Christopher Toigo, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual
Case Number: 22-1876
Filed: April 28, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 26, 2023 Summary Micah Riggs v. Robert Gibbs

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2022 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5165710-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Jon R. Dedon. Brief of Micah B. Riggs due 07/15/2022. Appendix due on 07/15/2022. [5166054] [22-1876] (CMD) [Entered: 06/09/2022 11:12 AM]
June 8, 2022 MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 07/15/2022, filed by Attorney Mr. Jon R. Dedon for Appellant Micah B. Riggs w/service 06/08/2022. [5165710] [22-1876] (JRD) [Entered: 06/08/2022 02:09 PM]
June 8, 2022 On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under [Rule 27], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file brief, [ # 5165710-2 ], submitted by Mr. Jon R. Dedon in 22-1876 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [22-1876] (CRJ) [Entered: 06/08/2022 02:30 PM]
June 8, 2022 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Jon R. Dedon for Appellant Micah B. Riggs correcting [ # 5165710-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Attorney. [5165876] [22-1876] (JRD) [Entered: 06/08/2022 05:42 PM]
May 12, 2022 METHOD of appendix preparation and Certificate of Transcript filed by Appellant Micah B. Riggs - Separate Appendix - w/service 05/12/2022 [5156816] [22-1876]--[Edited 05/12/2022 by CRJ. Entry edited to add transcript notice.] (JRD) [Entered: 05/12/2022 11:42 AM]
May 10, 2022 APPEARANCE filed by Nicolas Taulbee for Appellees Robert Gibbs, Chris Onik, Christopher Toigo and Teddy Taylor w/service 05/10/2022 [5155950] [22-1876] (NT) [Entered: 05/10/2022 01:23 PM]
May 6, 2022 APPEARANCE filed by Jon R. Dedon for Appellant Micah B. Riggs w/service 05/06/2022 [5155191] [22-1876] (JRD) [Entered: 05/06/2022 05:22 PM]
April 28, 2022 Civil case docketed. [5151811] [22-1876] (CAH) [Entered: 04/28/2022 11:34 AM]
April 28, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, judgment 3/29/22. [5151813] [22-1876] (CAH) [Entered: 04/28/2022 11:41 AM]
April 28, 2022 BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 06/07/2022. Appendix due 06/17/2022. BRIEF APPELLANT, Micah B. Riggs due 06/17/2022 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5151815] [22-1876] (CAH) [Entered: 04/28/2022 11:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Micah Riggs v. Robert Gibbs, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Micah B. Riggs
Represented By: Henry T. Bell
Represented By: Jon R. Dedon
Represented By: Ryan M. Peck
Represented By: Will B. Wohlford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Robert Gibbs, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual
Represented By: Diane Peters
Represented By: Nicolas Taulbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Chris Onik, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual
Represented By: Diane Peters
Represented By: Nicolas Taulbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Teddy Taylor, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual
Represented By: Diane Peters
Represented By: Nicolas Taulbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Christopher Toigo, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual
Represented By: Diane Peters
Represented By: Nicolas Taulbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Barbour, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Feagans, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alan Whaley, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brad Dumit, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and, as an individual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?