Olga Rodriguez-De-Mejia, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
| Olga Patricia Rodriguez-De-Mejia, R.T.M. and Jennifer Patricia Mejia-Rodriguez |
| Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States |
| 22-1896 |
| April 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by James A. Hurley for Respondent Merrick B. Garland w/service 04/29/2022 [5152492] [22-1896] (JAH) [Entered: 04/29/2022 04:03 PM] |
| CONSOLIDATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Administrative Record due 06/08/2022. Brief of Jennifer Patricia Mejia-Rodriguez, R.T.M. and Olga Patricia Rodriguez-De-Mejia due on 06/22/2022. Responsive brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief.[5152464] [21-3136, 22-1896] (AEV) [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:40 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The petition for review filed in 21-3136 was held in abeyance pending a ruling on a motion for reconsideration. The Board of Immigration Appeals has ruled. Case no. 21-3136 is removed from abeyance and is consolidated with case no. 22-1896. A consolidated briefing schedule will be issued and the case is resumed. [5152437] [21-3136] (AEV) [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:19 PM] |
| PETITION for Review of an order of the Board of Immigraton Appeals (Electronic) filed by Petitioners Jennifer Patricia Mejia-Rodriguez, R.T.M. and Olga Patricia Rodriguez-De-Mejia w/service 04/29/2022 [5152429] [22-1896] (AEV) [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:11 PM] |
| Agency case docketed [5152428] [22-1896] (AEV) [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
