Karl Roberts v. Dexter Payne
Karl Roberts |
Dexter Payne |
22-1935 |
May 4, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Death Penalty |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
JUDGE ORDER: Granting [ # 5165356-2 ] motion to file an overlength application for certificate of appealability filed by Ms. Stephanie Smith.Granting [ # 5167092-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response filed by Mr. Jason Michael Johnson and Mr. Michael C. Zangari. Response of Dexter Payne due 07/19/2022. The briefing schedule remains in abeyance pending resolution of the certificate of appealability. Adp June 2022 [5168567] [22-1935] (MVP) [Entered: 06/16/2022 01:45 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file response to Application, [ # 5166358-2 ], until 07/19/2022, filed by Mr. Michael C. Zangari for Appellee Dexter Payne and Mr. Jason Michael Johnson for Appellee Dexter Payne w/service 06/13/2022. [5167092] [22-1935] (MCZ) [Entered: 06/13/2022 02:31 PM] |
LETTER from Appellee Dexter Payne regarding Request for extension of Time to Respond to Appellant's Application for Certificate of Appealability. w/service 06/10/2022 [5166723] [22-1935]--[DOCUMENT LOCKED and refiled. See history number 5167092. Edited 06/14/2022 by MVP] (MCZ) [Entered: 06/10/2022 03:03 PM] |
APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Mr. Karl Roberts w/service 06/09/2022 [5166358] [22-1935] (SS) [Entered: 06/09/2022 04:54 PM] |
MOTION to file an overlength motion, filed by Attorney Ms. Stephanie Smith for Appellant Mr. Karl Roberts w/service 06/07/2022. [5165356] [22-1935]--[Edited to correct docket text 06/08/2022 by MVP] (Edited to reflect correct relief)--[Edited 06/09/2022 by CMD] (SS) [Entered: 06/07/2022 03:58 PM] |
MOTION to hold briefing schedule in abeyance, filed by Attorney Ms. Stephanie Smith for Appellant Mr. Karl Roberts w/service 05/10/2022. [5155751] [22-1935] (SS) [Entered: 05/10/2022 08:54 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5155751-2 ] motion hold briefing schedule in abeyance pending the filing of a motion for an expansion of the certificate of appealability in this court. Appellant has until June 9, 2022 to file such a motion. [5155867] [22-1935] (MVP) [Entered: 05/10/2022 11:01 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by John C. Williams for Appellant Mr. Karl Roberts w/service 05/05/2022 [5154790] [22-1935] (JCW) [Entered: 05/05/2022 04:24 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Stephanie Smith for Appellant Mr. Karl Roberts w/service 05/05/2022 [5154405] [22-1935] (SS) [Entered: 05/05/2022 08:49 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [5154225] [22-1935] (CAH) [Entered: 05/04/2022 02:47 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, memorandum & order 9/20/21, judgment 9/20/21, order 10/18/21, order 1/11/22, order 5/4/22. [5154222] [22-1935] (CAH) [Entered: 05/04/2022 02:46 PM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 06/13/2022. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Karl Roberts due 06/13/2022. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5154231] [22-1935] (CAH) [Entered: 05/04/2022 02:50 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Rachel Kemp for Appellee Dexter Payne w/service 05/04/2022 [5154334] [22-1935] (RMK) [Entered: 05/04/2022 04:29 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Michael Zangari for Appellee Dexter Payne w/service 05/04/2022 [5154347] [22-1935] (MCZ) [Entered: 05/04/2022 04:54 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Jason M. Johnson for Appellee Dexter Payne w/service 05/04/2022 [5154346] [22-1935] (JMJ) [Entered: 05/04/2022 04:49 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5154200] [22-1935] (CAH) [Entered: 05/04/2022 02:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.