Carl Davis v. Andrew Simpson
Carl Davis, doing business as Davis Construction Co. |
Andrew Simpson and Andrew Dean Simpson, I |
Secretary Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture and Tommy James, in his official capacity as Area Director of Monticello, AR area office of USDA Rural Development Agnecy |
22-1961 |
May 9, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOCUMENT FILED - Correspondence filed by Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis w/service by USCA8 on 06/23/2022 [5171035] [22-1961] (CNL) [Entered: 06/24/2022 11:55 AM] |
JUDGE ORDER: The motion to supplement the record is denied [ # 5164194-2 ]. The motion for court appointment of counsel is denied [ # 5168697-2 ]. Adp May 2022 [5169867] [22-1961] (CNL) [Entered: 06/22/2022 08:55 AM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 07/22/2022, filed by Party Mr. Andrew Dean Simpson, I w/service 06/22/2022. [5170103] [22-1961]--[Edited 06/23/2022 by CNL. Modified date of extension requested. NDA resent.] (ADS) [Entered: 06/22/2022 01:05 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: Granting [ # 5170103-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Appellant Mr. Andrew Dean Simpson, I. Brief of Andrew Dean Simpson I due 07/22/2022 [5170142] [22-1961] (CNL) [Entered: 06/22/2022 01:52 PM] |
MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Party Mr. Andrew Dean Simpson, I w/service 06/16/2022. [5168697] [22-1961] (ADS) [Entered: 06/16/2022 04:33 PM] |
JUDGE ORDER: Upon consideration of appellants motion for relief from judgment [ # 5164393-2 ], the courts order of June 1, 2022 denying a motion for appointment of counsel, is vacated [5163506-2]. Adp May 2022 [5166238] [22-1961] (CNL) [Entered: 06/09/2022 02:12 PM] |
MOTION relief from judgement issued on 06/01/2022, filed by Party Mr. Andrew Dean Simpson, I w/service 06/03/2022. [5164393] [22-1961] (ADS) [Entered: 06/03/2022 03:44 PM] |
MOTION to supplement the record., filed by Appellant Mr. Andrew Dean Simpson, I w/service 06/03/2022. [5164194] [22-1961]--[Edited to correct the filing event and relief 06/03/2022 by AMT] (ADS) [Entered: 06/03/2022 11:23 AM] |
****DOCUMENT LOCKED****JUDGE ORDER: The motion for appointment of counsel is denied [ # 5159957-2 ]. Adp May 2022 [5163506] [22-1961]--[Edited 06/09/2022 by CNL] THIS ORDER HAS BEEN VACATED PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S ORDER DATED JUNE 9, 2022. (CNL) [Entered: 06/01/2022 03:47 PM] |
MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Party Mr. Andrew Dean Simpson, I w/service 05/23/2022. [5159957] [22-1961] [5159957] [22-1961]--[Edited to change relief of motion 05/31/2022 by CNL] (ADS) [Entered: 05/23/2022 10:06 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, orders 3/15/22, 4/19/22, and 5/6/22. [5155399] [22-1961] (CAH) [Entered: 05/09/2022 11:36 AM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Andrew Simpson due 06/21/2022. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5155402] [22-1961] (CAH) [Entered: 05/09/2022 11:37 AM] |
Civil case docketed. [5155394] [22-1961] (CAH) [Entered: 05/09/2022 11:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.