Gary Eye v. United States
| Gary Eye |
| United States of America |
| 22-2116 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by David M. Ketchmark for Respondent United States of America w/service 05/27/2022 [5162028] [22-2116] (DMK) [Entered: 05/27/2022 09:05 AM] |
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition filed by Petitioner Mr. Gary Eye w/service 05/16/2022. Response of United States of America due 06/09/2022 (Rec'd by MAIL) [5161792] [22-2116] (AEV) [Entered: 05/26/2022 01:16 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5161791] [22-2116] (AEV) [Entered: 05/26/2022 01:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gary Eye v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Gary Eye | |
| Represented By: | Gary Eye |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | David M. Ketchmark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
