Dale McCoy v. United States
| Dale McCoy |
| United States of America |
| 22-2137 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied [ # 5164278-2 ]. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, DAVID R. STRAS and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp July 2022 [5179119] [22-2137] (BNW) [Entered: 07/20/2022 01:41 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, David R. Stras, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5179116] [22-2137] (BNW) [Entered: 07/20/2022 01:38 PM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM in support of Application for certificate of appealability, filed by Mr. Dale McCoy w/service 07/08/2022. [5175540] [22-2137] (CMH) [Entered: 07/08/2022 01:00 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting in Part [ # 5167215-2 ] motion ext of time to file document filed by Appellant Mr. Dale McCoy. Appellant is granted an additional 30 days, or until July 13, 2022 to file any additional pleadings in support of his case. [5167217] [5167217] [22-2137] (AEV) [Entered: 06/13/2022 04:52 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file "brief" an additional 45 days, filed by Appellant Mr. Dale McCoy. [5167215] [22-2137] (AEV) [Entered: 06/13/2022 04:50 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 06/06/2022 Denying IFP as moot, [5164847] [22-2137] (AEV) [Entered: 06/06/2022 04:12 PM] |
| APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Mr. Dale McCoy w/service 05/26/2022 [5164278] [22-2137] (AEV) [Entered: 06/03/2022 01:00 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5162794] [22-2137] (AEV) [Entered: 05/31/2022 01:56 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 4/15/21, Judgment 4/15/21, Order 5/3/22, docket entries, [5162801] [22-2137] (AEV) [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:05 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5162808] [22-2137] (AEV) [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dale McCoy v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Dale McCoy | |
| Represented By: | Dale McCoy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Dan Chatham |
| Represented By: | Ashley Corkery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
