Ricky Schuh v. Steven Balaban, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant / Appellee: Steven Balaban, Public Defender and Tessa M. Vaagen, Assistant Burleigh County State's Attorney
Case Number: 22-2173
Filed: June 3, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2022 JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A(a). RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, DAVID R. STRAS and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp July 2022 [5178766] [22-2173] (CRJ) [Entered: 07/19/2022 04:22 PM]
July 18, 2022 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, David R. Stras, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5178764] [22-2173] (CRJ) [Entered: 07/19/2022 04:18 PM]
June 8, 2022 UPDATED fee status - from Pending to PLRA. [Case Number 22-2173: plra] [5165572] [22-2173] (ASL) [Entered: 06/08/2022 10:52 AM]
June 8, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 06/07/2022 Granting IFP on appeal, [5165568] [22-2173] (ASL) [Entered: 06/08/2022 10:47 AM]
June 3, 2022 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5164276] [22-2173] (ASL) [Entered: 06/03/2022 12:58 PM]
June 3, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order of Dismissal filed 5/23/2022, Judgment filed 5/23/2022, and docket entries, [5164268] [22-2173] (ASL) [Entered: 06/03/2022 12:48 PM]
June 3, 2022 UPDATED fee status - from Due to Pending. Mistakenly indicated Due at case initiation. Motion to proceed on appeal IFP pending in the district court. [Case Number 22-2173: pending] [5164270] [22-2173] (ASL) [Entered: 06/03/2022 12:52 PM]
June 3, 2022 Prisoner case docketed. [5164255] [22-2173] (ASL) [Entered: 06/03/2022 12:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ricky Schuh v. Steven Balaban, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Ricky R. Schuh
Represented By: Ricky R. Schuh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Steven Balaban, Public Defender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Tessa M. Vaagen, Assistant Burleigh County State's Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?