United States v. Roger Cooley
United States of America |
Roger Rachon Cooley |
22-2201 |
June 7, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE filed by Dawn M. Deitz for Appellee United States of America w/service 06/08/2022 [5165522] [22-2201] (DMD) [Entered: 06/08/2022 09:47 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Megan Healy for Appellee United States of America w/service 06/08/2022 [5165524] [22-2201] (MAH) [Entered: 06/08/2022 09:49 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Adam Justinger for Appellant Roger Rachon Cooley w/service 06/08/2022 [5165478] [22-2201] (AJ) [Entered: 06/08/2022 08:42 AM] |
CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on 07/18/2022. PSI due 07/18/2022. Brief of appellant due on 08/01/2022. Appellee(s) brief due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Reply brief due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief.[5165407] [22-2201] (ASL) [Entered: 06/07/2022 04:48 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed 1/19/2022, Order filed 1/24/2022, Judgment filed 5/31/2022, and docket entries, [5165393] [22-2201] (ASL) [Entered: 06/07/2022 04:36 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: Appointing Mr. Adam J. Justinger for Roger Rachon Cooley under the Criminal Justice Act. [5165403] [22-2201] (ASL) [Entered: 06/07/2022 04:44 PM] |
CRIMINAL case docketed. [5165392] [22-2201] (ASL) [Entered: 06/07/2022 04:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.