Shavelle Chavez-Nelson v. Gov. Timothy Walz, et al
| Shavelle Oscar Chavez-Nelson, In Propria Persona: Ex Relatione |
| Governor Timothy Walz and Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections |
| 22-2304 |
| June 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Heather Pipenhagen for Appellees Mr. Timothy Walz and Mr. Paul Schnell w/service 06/21/2022 [5169638] [22-2304] (HDP) [Entered: 06/21/2022 03:03 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5169374] [22-2304] (MMH) [Entered: 06/21/2022 11:09 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Report and Recommendation 12/3/21, Order adopting R&R 5/18/22, and Judgment 5/23/22 [5169373] [22-2304] (MMH) [Entered: 06/21/2022 11:08 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5169369] [22-2304] (MMH) [Entered: 06/21/2022 11:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
