Mary Meier v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
| St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, Richard H. Gray, Member, St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, in his official capacity, Thomas Irwin, Member, St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, in his official capacity, Erwin Switzer, Member, St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, in his official capacity, Bettye Battle-Turner, Member, St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, in her official capacity, Francis G. Slay, in his official capacity as a member ex officio of the St. Louis City Board of Police Commissioners, Doc's Towing, Inc. and St. Louis P.O. House, DSN 219 |
| Mary R. Meier |
| City of St. Louis, Missouri |
| 22-2332 |
| June 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Mary Meier v. City of St. Louis, Missouri
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CROSS APPEAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 07/18/2022. BRIEF APPELLANT, City of St. Louis, Missouri due 07/28/2022. Appendix due 07/28/2022. Appellee/cross Appellant brief due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant's brief. [5170591] [22-2206, 22-2332] (AEV) [Entered: 06/23/2022 12:30 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of cross-appeal, Judgment 3/11/22, docket entries, [5170581] [22-2332] (AEV) [Entered: 06/23/2022 12:18 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5170577] [22-2332] (AEV) [Entered: 06/23/2022 12:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
