Omid Hamzehzadeh v. St. Charles County, Missouri, et al
| St. Charles County Police Department |
| Omid Hamzehzadeh |
| St. Charles County, Missouri, David Todd, Christopher Hunt and Joann Leykam |
| 22-2349 |
| June 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Omid Hamzehzadeh v. St. Charles County, Missouri |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding new caption in case. [5172088] [22-2349] (EDG) [Entered: 06/28/2022 11:06 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Frank J. Smith, Jr. for Appellees Christopher Hunt, Joann Leykam, St. Charles County and David Todd w/service 06/28/2022 [5172168] [22-2349] (FJS) [Entered: 06/28/2022 12:10 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Bryan E. Wise for Appellees Christopher Hunt, Joann Leykam, St. Charles County, and David Todd w/service 06/28/2022. [5171981] [22-2349]--[Edited to revise dkt txt 06/28/2022 by HAG] (BEW) [Entered: 06/28/2022 09:53 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 08/08/2022. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Omid Hamzehzadeh due 08/08/2022. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5171452] [22-2349] (AEV) [Entered: 06/27/2022 10:09 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Memorandum and Order 5/25/22, Judgment 5/25/22, docket entries, [5171449] [22-2349] (AEV) [Entered: 06/27/2022 10:08 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5171434] [22-2349] (AEV) [Entered: 06/27/2022 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
