United States v. Robert Stiles
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Robert Carlton Stiles, also known as Tynk
Case Number: 22-2529
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Judgment filed 9/13/2021, and docket entries, [5178690] [22-2529] (ASL) [Entered: 07/19/2022 02:52 PM]
July 19, 2022 CRIMINAL case docketed. [5178684] [22-2529] (ASL) [Entered: 07/19/2022 02:44 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States v. Robert Stiles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Shanon M. Gregor
Represented By: Brett M. Shasky
Represented By: Alexander James Stock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Robert Carlton Stiles, also known as Tynk
Represented By: Robert Carlton Stiles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?