Austin Lightfeather v. Ken Prey, et al
Defendant: Wilson, Officer and Four Unknown Inmates
Plaintiff / Appellant: Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant / Appellee: Ken Prey, Administrator, in their individual capacity, Brad Johnson, Director of Administrations, in their individual capacity, Mr. Crapo, Religious Coordinator, in their individual capacity, Jenkins, A.P.R.N., in their individual capacity, Stephenie Last Name Unknown, Mental Health LMHP, in their individual capacity, Linton N. Baker, Inmate, in their individual capacity, Dawning, Officer, in their individual capacity, Officer Speka, in their individual capacity, Robert Haze, Inmate, in their individual capacity, Travis Golden, Inmate, in their individual capacity, Cornileous Weaver, Inmate, in their individual capacity and John Thomson, Inmate, in their individual capacity
Case Number: 22-2531
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2022 JUDGMENT FILED - The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [ # 5188538-2 ] is denied. The full $505 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. The court remands the collection of those fees to the district court. Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as untimely. STEVEN M. COLLOTON, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Sep 2022 [5196128] [22-2531] (NDG) [Entered: 09/08/2022 10:49 AM]
August 17, 2022 CLERK LETTER sent regarding Appellant's response was also construed as a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis which must include an Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs or an affidavit that shows in the same detail your inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs. A prisoner seeking to appeal in forma pauperis must also submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal, obtained from the appropriate official(s). As a courtesy, we have enclosed a copy of the Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. These forms/documents are due no later than August 31, 2022. . [5188542] [22-2531] (AEV) [Entered: 08/17/2022 03:45 PM]
August 2, 2022 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Mr. Austin Edward Lightfeather. [5188538] [22-2531] (AEV) [Entered: 08/17/2022 03:39 PM]
August 2, 2022 RESPONSE to clerk order pay full filing fee [ # 5178765-2 ], [ # 5178765-3 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Austin Edward Lightfeather , w/service 08/17/2022.(originally filed in district court.) [5188351] [22-2531] (AEV) [Entered: 08/17/2022 11:44 AM]
July 19, 2022 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5178770] [22-2531] (AEV) [Entered: 07/19/2022 04:25 PM]
July 19, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Memorandum and Order 4/8/22, Judgment 4/8/22, Memorandum and Order 7/5/22, Memorandum and Order 7/15/22, docket entries, [5178763] [22-2531] (AEV) [Entered: 07/19/2022 04:18 PM]
July 19, 2022 CLERK ORDER:The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 08/18/2022 [5178765] [22-2531] (AEV) [Entered: 07/19/2022 04:21 PM]
July 19, 2022 Prisoner case docketed. [5178759] [22-2531] (AEV) [Entered: 07/19/2022 04:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Austin Lightfeather v. Ken Prey, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Austin Edward Lightfeather
Represented By: Austin Edward Lightfeather
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Ken Prey, Administrator, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Brad Johnson, Director of Administrations, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Mr. Crapo, Religious Coordinator, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Jenkins, A.P.R.N., in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Stephenie Last Name Unknown, Mental Health LMHP, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Linton N. Baker, Inmate, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Dawning, Officer, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Officer Speka, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Robert Haze, Inmate, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Travis Golden, Inmate, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Cornileous Weaver, Inmate, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Thomson, Inmate, in their individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilson, Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Four Unknown Inmates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?