Radai Mendez Dominguez v. Merrick Garland
Radai Obed Mendez Dominguez |
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States |
22-2589 |
July 28, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Radai Mendez Dominguez v. Merrick Garland |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE filed by Remi Da Rocha-Afodu for Respondent Merrick B. Garland w/service 07/29/2022 [5182258] [22-2589] (Rd) [Entered: 07/29/2022 11:56 AM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Original file of originating court shall serve as record on appeal. Appendices required by 8th Cir. Rule 30A shall not be required. Clerk of originating agency is requested to forward the file forthwith together with any exhibits. Administrative Record due 09/06/2022. Brief of Radai Obed Mendez Dominguez due on 09/20/2022. Responsive brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief.[5181946] [22-2589] (CAH) [Entered: 07/28/2022 02:44 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:directing Mr. Carl H. McIntyre for Merrick B. Garland to file a response to motion for stay, [ # 5181936-2 ]. Merrick B. Garland response due on 08/08/2022 [5181942] [22-2589] (CAH) [Entered: 07/28/2022 02:39 PM] |
MOTION for stay of removal, filed by Petitioner Radai Obed Mendez Dominguez w/service 07/28/2022. [5181936] [22-2589] (CAH) [Entered: 07/28/2022 02:30 PM] |
PETITION for Review of an order of the BIA (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Radai Obed Mendez Dominguez w/service 07/28/2022 [5181924] [22-2589] (CAH) [Entered: 07/28/2022 02:12 PM] |
Agency case docketed [5181919] [22-2589] (CAH) [Entered: 07/28/2022 02:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.