Billy Nichols, Jr. v. Gary Kerstein, et al
| Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. |
| Gary Kerstein, Doctor, East Arkansas Regional Max Security Unit, Tracy Bennett, APRN, East Arkansas Regional Max Security Unit, Duvall, LPN, East Arkansas Regional Max Security Unit, K. McCain, APN, Nurse Practitioner, Brickey's East Arkansas Regional Unit - Max, Smith, APN, East Arkansas Regional Max Security Unit, ADC, Moody, APN, East Arkansas Regional Max Security Unit, ADC, Arkansas State Medical Board, WellPath, Medical Company, Jackson, Woodard, Arkansas Division of Corrections, Golett, Nurse/LPN, EARU, ADC, Maddic, LPN, Dunlap, LPN and Butler, LPN |
| 22-2710 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5203925-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response to the clerk order filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Mack Nichols, Jr.. Response of Billy Mack Nichols Jr. due 10/17/2022 [5203931] [22-2710] (CMH) [Entered: 10/03/2022 12:10 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant has filed a motion seeking an extension of time to file a response to this court's order issued on 8/15/2022. The motion has been granted and the show cause order of 9/27/2022 is hereby dissolved. [5203937] [22-2710] (CMH) [Entered: 10/03/2022 12:15 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file response to clerk order pay full filing fee, [ # 5187311-2 ], filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. w/service 10/03/2022. [5203925] [22-2710] (CMH) [Entered: 10/03/2022 12:06 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees or file a response to the 8/15/2022 order in this court. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Billy Mack Nichols Jr. due 10/11/2022. [5202070] [22-2710] (CMH) [Entered: 09/27/2022 09:03 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5187335] [22-2710] (CMH) [Entered: 08/15/2022 10:22 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order and Judgment 4/11/2022, Order 7/29/2022 and Order 8/12/2022. [5187306] [22-2710]--[Edited 08/25/2022 by CMH] (CMH) [Entered: 08/15/2022 10:00 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 09/14/2022 [5187311] [22-2710] (CMH) [Entered: 08/15/2022 10:03 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5187269] [22-2710] (CMH) [Entered: 08/15/2022 09:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
