Timothy Prosser v. Bill Stange
| Timothy M. Prosser |
| Bill Stange, Warden of Southeast Correctional Center |
| 22-2727 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Mr. Timothy M. Prosser, w/service 08/16/2022. Response of Bill Stange due 08/30/2022. [5187797] [22-2727] (CJO) [Entered: 08/16/2022 09:23 AM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5187786] [22-2727] (CJO) [Entered: 08/16/2022 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Timothy Prosser v. Bill Stange | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Timothy M. Prosser | |
| Represented By: | Timothy M. Prosser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bill Stange, Warden of Southeast Correctional Center | |
| Represented By: | Stephen David Hawke |
| Represented By: | Habeas Unit Missouri Attorney General |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
