Charles Hamner v. Diane Bowman
Plaintiff / Appellant: Charles Hamner
Defendant / Appellee: Diane Bowman, Circuit Clerk, Lee County
Case Number: 22-2845
Filed: August 30, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2022 JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. Appellant's [ # 5196775-2 ] motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied as moot. The full $505 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. The court remands the collection of those fees to the district court. JAMES B. LOKEN, DUANE BENTON and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Oct 2022 [5209286] [22-2845] (HAG) [Entered: 10/19/2022 11:13 AM]
October 6, 2022 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Duane Benton, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5209279] [22-2845] (HAG) [Entered: 10/19/2022 11:05 AM]
September 9, 2022 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Hamner w/service 09/09/2022. [5196775] [22-2845] (CAH) [Entered: 09/09/2022 03:20 PM]
August 30, 2022 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5193091] [22-2845] (CAH) [Entered: 08/30/2022 04:13 PM]
August 30, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order 8/5/22, judgment 8/5/22, order 8/30/22. [5193089] [22-2845] (CAH) [Entered: 08/30/2022 04:10 PM]
August 30, 2022 CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/27/2022, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5193090] [22-2845] (CAH) [Entered: 08/30/2022 04:11 PM]
August 30, 2022 Prisoner case docketed. [5193087] [22-2845] (CAH) [Entered: 08/30/2022 04:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Hamner v. Diane Bowman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Charles Hamner
Represented By: Charles Hamner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Diane Bowman, Circuit Clerk, Lee County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?