Gamada Hussein v. Eric Schmitt, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Defendant / Appellee: Eric Stephen Schmitt, MO Attorney General, FBI, Satellite Office in Southern MO, Neosho Police Department, Joplin City Police Department, Freeman Health System, Mercy Joplin Hospital and John Does
Case Number: 22-2891
Filed: September 6, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2022 Tendered Additional Supplementary Evidences for Motion of Reconsideration received from Appellant Mr. Gamada Ahmed Hussein in 22-2877 [5215052] [22-2877, 22-2891, 22-3021] (ASL) [Entered: 11/04/2022 03:06 PM]
October 31, 2022 JUDGE ORDER: The motion for reconsideration and appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Gamada Ahmed Hussein is denied [ # 5213024-2 ]. Adp Oct 2022 [5213236] [22-2891] (BNW) [Entered: 10/31/2022 03:27 PM]
October 28, 2022 Tendered Motion for Reconsideration received from Appellant Gamada Ahmed Hussein w/service 10/28/2022 [5212775] [22-2891] (MMH) [Entered: 10/28/2022 03:22 PM]
October 28, 2022 MOTION for reconsideration of judge order , [ # 5209568-2 ], for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Mr. Gamada Ahmed Hussein w/service by USCA8 10/28/2022. [5213024] [22-2891] (MTB) [Entered: 10/31/2022 11:06 AM]
October 19, 2022 Tendered Motion for Expedited Rehearing and Appointment of Counsel received from Appellant Mr. Gamada Ahmed Hussein [5209156] [22-2891] (CBO) [Entered: 10/19/2022 08:47 AM]
October 19, 2022 MOTION to expedite rehearing and motion for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Mr. Gamada Ahmed Hussein w/service 10/19/2022. [5209283] [22-2891] (BNW) [Entered: 10/19/2022 11:12 AM]
October 19, 2022 JUDGE ORDER: The motion to expedite rehearing and for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Gamada Ahmed Hussein is denied [ # 5209283-2 ]. Adp Oct 2022 [5209568] [22-2891] (BNW) [Entered: 10/19/2022 04:38 PM]
October 17, 2022 PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. Gamada Ahmed Hussein w/service 10/17/2022 by USCA8. [5208401] [22-2891] (BNW) [Entered: 10/17/2022 12:53 PM]
October 17, 2022 Tendered Petition for Rehearing received from Appellant Gamada Ahmed Hussein w/service 10/17/2022 [5208330] [22-2891] (MMH) [Entered: 10/17/2022 11:39 AM]
October 3, 2022 JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 5202247-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Gamada Ahmed Hussein., This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A.; Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied as moot. [ # 5197070-2 ] JAMES B. LOKEN, DUANE BENTON and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Sep 2022 [5204136] [22-2891] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/03/2022 03:35 PM]
October 3, 2022 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Duane Benton, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5204130] [22-2891] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/03/2022 03:30 PM]
September 26, 2022 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Gamada Ahmed Hussein w/service 09/26/2022. [5202247] [22-2891] (MMH) [Entered: 09/27/2022 12:09 PM]
September 12, 2022 MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Gamada Ahmed Hussein. [5197070] [22-2891] (MMH) [Entered: 09/12/2022 11:04 AM]
September 6, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 8/17/22, Judgment 8/18/22, and Order denying IFP 9/1/22 [5195264] [22-2891] (MMH) [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:48 PM]
September 6, 2022 CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in tthis court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/27/2022, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5195266] [22-2891] (MMH) [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:50 PM]
September 6, 2022 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5195268] [22-2891] (MMH) [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:53 PM]
September 6, 2022 Civil case docketed. [5195259] [22-2891] (MMH) [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:40 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gamada Hussein v. Eric Schmitt, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Represented By: Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Eric Stephen Schmitt, MO Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FBI, Satellite Office in Southern MO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Neosho Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Joplin City Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Freeman Health System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Mercy Joplin Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?