Terron Pool v. David Vandergriff
Terron Pool |
David Vandergriff |
22-2988 |
September 20, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 22-2988: In Forma Pauperis] [5211234] [22-2988] (CAH) [Entered: 10/25/2022 11:37 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Kevin L. Schriener for Appellant Mr. Terron Pool w/service 10/24/2022 [5210423] [22-2988] (KLS) [Entered: 10/24/2022 07:38 AM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file COA until 11/23/2022, filed by Attorney Mr. Kevin L. Schriener for Appellant Mr. Terron Pool w/service 10/24/2022. [5210424] [22-2988] (KLS) [Entered: 10/24/2022 07:39 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5210424-2 ] motion for extension of time to file app for COA filed by Mr. Kevin L. Schriener. [5210635] [22-2988] (CAH) [Entered: 10/24/2022 10:28 AM] |
UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 22-2988: paid - cs] [5208850] [22-2988] (CAH) [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:09 PM] |
District court docket text order of 10/13/2022 granting ifp, [5208847] [22-2988] (CAH) [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:08 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5202206] [22-2988] (CAH) [Entered: 09/27/2022 11:21 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, memorandum & order 8/23/22, judgment 8/23/22. [5200322] [22-2988] (CAH) [Entered: 09/20/2022 03:51 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 10/11/2022, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5200323] [22-2988] (CAH) [Entered: 09/20/2022 03:52 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5200320] [22-2988] (CAH) [Entered: 09/20/2022 03:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Terron Pool v. David Vandergriff | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Terron Pool | |
Represented By: | Terron Pool |
Represented By: | Kevin L. Schriener |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: David Vandergriff | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Jared Kweskin |
Represented By: | Andrew Crane |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.