Katie Whitworth v. Mark Kling, et al
| Katie Whitworth |
| Mark Kling, Individually and in his Official Capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Bryant, AR and City of Bryant |
| 22-3051 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER: Granting in Part [ # 5219898-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Luther Oneal Sutter and Mr. Lucien R. Gillham. [5220257] Brief of Katie Whitworth due 12/21/2022. Appendix due on 12/21/2022. [5220257] [22-3051] (HAG) [Entered: 11/22/2022 10:55 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 01/05/2023, filed by Mr. Luther Oneal Sutter for Appellant Ms. Katie Whitworth and Mr. Lucien R. Gillham for Appellant Ms. Katie Whitworth w/service 11/21/2022. [5219898] [22-3051] (LOS) [Entered: 11/21/2022 02:42 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - MOTION TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Comments: District Court document #76 [Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / EA, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 08/26/2022, No. of Pgs.: 46, Court Reporter: Franklin, Stephen W. [5218357] [22-3051] (STL) [Entered: 11/16/2022 10:23 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - HEARING TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Comments: Telephone Hearing - District Court document #73 [Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / EALR, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 05/13/2022, No. of Pgs.: 12, Court Reporter: Hollingsworth, Teresa [5214097] [22-3051] (STL) [Entered: 11/02/2022 10:33 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - HEARING TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Comments: Telephone Hearing - District Court document #74 [Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / EALR, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 09/09/2022, No. of Pgs.: 25, Court Reporter: Hollingsworth, Teresa [5214103] [22-3051] (STL) [Entered: 11/02/2022 10:35 AM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Ms. Katie Whitworth - Separate Appendix - w/service 10/12/2022 [5206897] [22-3051] (LOS) [Entered: 10/12/2022 10:24 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 22-3051: paid - cs] [5206152] [22-3051] (AEV) [Entered: 10/07/2022 03:59 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Lucien Gillham for Appellant Ms. Katie Whitworth w/service 10/07/2022 [5206018] [22-3051]--[Edited to note that the address on the appearance form where the firm is moving to this week. I talked to the paralegal and she advised that pacer accounts would be updated Monday 10/10/22. 10/07/2022 by AT] (LOS) [Entered: 10/07/2022 12:48 PM] |
| **DOCUMENT LOCKED**APPEARANCE filed by LUTHER SUTTER for Appellant Ms. Katie Whitworth w/service 10/07/2022 [5206014] [22-3051] [5206014] [22-3051]--[Edited 10/12/2022 by AT] APPEARANCE FORM WAS UPLOADED IN THE WRONG CASE. (LOS) [Entered: 10/07/2022 12:44 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Russell A. Wood for Appellee Mark Kling w/service 10/05/2022 [5204940] [22-3051] (RAW) [Entered: 10/05/2022 10:59 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Gabrielle Gibson for Appellees City of Bryant and Mark Kling w/service 10/04/2022 [5204464] [22-3051] (GDG) [Entered: 10/04/2022 11:04 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 9/9/22, Judgment 9/9/22, docket entries, [5203445] [22-3051] (AEV) [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:24 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 11/09/2022. Appendix due 11/21/2022. BRIEF APPELLANT, Katie Whitworth due 11/21/2022 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5203450] [22-3051] (AEV) [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:27 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5203432] [22-3051] (AEV) [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
