Sylvester Cunningham v. Penny Spencer, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sylvester Cunningham
Defendant / Appellee: Penny S. Spencer and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Case Number: 22-3056
Filed: September 30, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2022 JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, DUANE BENTON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Nov 2022 [5218257] [22-3056] (AT) [Entered: 11/16/2022 08:12 AM]
November 7, 2022 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Duane Benton, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5218177] [22-3056] (AT) [Entered: 11/15/2022 03:31 PM]
October 18, 2022 UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 22-3056: plra] [5208894] [22-3056] (AEV) [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:59 PM]
October 18, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 10/18/2022 granting IFP and setting a payment plan., [5208866] [22-3056] (AEV) [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:22 PM]
September 30, 2022 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5203524] [22-3056] (AEV) [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:13 PM]
September 30, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 8/17/22, Order 9/15/22, Judgment 9/15/22, docket entries, [5203517] [22-3056] (AEV) [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:07 PM]
September 30, 2022 CLERK ORDER:for limited remand This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of determining the appellant's IFP status and assessment of the docketing fees pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915 as amended by PLRA. [5203518] [22-3056] (AEV) [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:08 PM]
September 30, 2022 Prisoner case docketed. [5203514] [22-3056] (AEV) [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sylvester Cunningham v. Penny Spencer, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Sylvester Cunningham
Represented By: Sylvester Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Penny S. Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?