LADS Network Solutions, Inc. v. Agilis Systems, LLC, et al
LADS Network Solutions, Inc. |
Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC |
22-3077 |
October 5, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Copyright |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RESPONSE in opposition to motion [ # 5211199-2 ] filed by Attorney Mr. Keith A. Rabenberg for Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc. , w/service 10/31/2022. [5212904] [22-3077] (KAR) [Entered: 10/31/2022 08:51 AM] |
MOTION to dismiss case, filed by Attorney Mr. Brian E. McGovern for Appellees Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC w/service 10/25/2022. [5211199] [22-3077] (BEM) [Entered: 10/25/2022 10:59 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Brian E. McGovern for Appellees Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC w/service 10/25/2022 [5211145] [22-3077]--[Edited 10/25/2022 by CRJ. COUNSEL'S APPEARANCE ALSO INCLUDES A SEPARATE MOTION TO DISMISS. THE MOTION HAS BEEN REFILED, SEE HISTORY #5211199] (BEM) [Entered: 10/25/2022 10:13 AM] |
On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under [Rule 27], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance with a word count. No action will be taken on your motion to dismiss case, [ # 5211199-2 ], submitted by Mr. Brian E. McGovern in 22-3077 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance with a word count using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [22-3077] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/25/2022 12:16 PM] |
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Brian E. McGovern for Appellees Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC correcting [ # 5211199-2 ] motion to dismiss case filed by Attorney. [5211341] [22-3077] (BEM) [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:20 PM] |
CLERK LETTER sent to hold briefing schedule in abeyance pending a decision on Appellees' motion to dismiss case. [5211416] [22-3077]--[Edited 10/27/2022 by CRJ. Entry edited to include reason for abeyance] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/25/2022 03:24 PM] |
METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc. - Separate Appendix - w/service 10/24/2022 [5211003] [22-3077] (KAR) [Entered: 10/24/2022 04:43 PM] |
Certificate of transcript filed by Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc.. No Transcript[5211001] [22-3077] (KAR) [Entered: 10/24/2022 04:40 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Keith A Rabenberg for Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc. w/service 10/24/2022 [5210992] [22-3077] (KAR) [Entered: 10/24/2022 04:33 PM] |
CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc.. - FOR CAL [5210996] [22-3077] (KAR) [Entered: 10/24/2022 04:34 PM] |
STATEMENT of issues and Designation of Record filed by Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc. - w/service 10/24/2022. [5211000] [22-3077]--[Edited 10/25/2022 by CRJ. Entry edited to add designation of record notice.] (KAR) [Entered: 10/24/2022 04:38 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 8/25/2021, Judgment 8/31/2021, and Memorandum & Order 9/28/2022. [5205131] [22-3077] (CMH) [Entered: 10/05/2022 02:30 PM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 11/14/2022. Appendix due 11/25/2022. BRIEF APPELLANT, LADS Network Solutions, Inc. due 11/25/2022 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5205136] [22-3077] (CMH) [Entered: 10/05/2022 02:33 PM] |
Civil case docketed. [5205126] [22-3077] (CMH) [Entered: 10/05/2022 02:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.