Florine Ching v. Ofc. Neal Walsh
| City of Minneapolis, in their individual and official capacities, Ofc. Ryan Keyes, in their individual and official capacities and Police Chief Medaria Arradondo, in their individual and official capacities |
| Florine K. Ching, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Travis Matthew Jordan, Decedent |
| Ofc. Neal Walsh, in their individual and official capacities |
| 22-3157 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Paper copies Appellant/Petitioner Brief, [ # 5225048-2 ] filed by Neal Walsh 10 paper copies received. w/Addendum attached [5226918] [22-3157] (CNL) [Entered: 12/13/2022 12:14 PM] |
| CORRECTED/INITIAL certificate of service for Appellant Paper Brief [5226918-2], filed by Appellant Neal Walsh [5226625] [22-3157]--[Edited 12/13/2022 by CNL. Modified to link to paper brief entry and correct docket text. NDA resent.] (SJL) [Entered: 12/12/2022 05:13 PM] |
| CORRECTED/INITIAL certificate of service for Joint Appendix [5225325-2], filed by Appellant Neal Walsh [5226626] [22-3157]--[Edited 12/13/2022 by CNL. Modified to correct docket text. NDA resent.] (SJL) [Entered: 12/12/2022 05:15 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 01/23/2023, filed by Attorney Mr. Benjamin Adam Gifford for Appellee Florine K. Ching w/service 12/09/2022. [5225645] [22-3157] (BAG) [Entered: 12/09/2022 12:52 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Granting [ # 5225645-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Benjamin Adam Gifford. Brief of Florine K. Ching due 01/23/2023. [5225773] [22-3157] (CNL) [Entered: 12/09/2022 03:04 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Neal Walsh. w/service 12/08/2022 , Length: 9,756 words. 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Neal Walsh due 12/13/2022 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs. Appellee/Responsive brief of Florine K. Ching due on 01/09/2023. [5225048] [22-3157] (CNL) [Entered: 12/08/2022 09:06 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - JOINT APPENDIX, 1 volumes. Comments: 1 volume, 3 copies. Flash drives found at pages 12 and 13. [5225325] [22-3157] (BNW) [Entered: 12/08/2022 03:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Benjamin Adam Gifford for Appellee Florine K. Ching w/service 12/08/2022 [5225336] [22-3157] (BAG) [Entered: 12/08/2022 03:35 PM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Neal Walsh submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5224857] [22-3157] (SJL) [Entered: 12/07/2022 02:11 PM] |
| ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Neal Walsh , w/service 12/07/2022 [5224753] [22-3157] (CNL) [Entered: 12/07/2022 11:49 AM] |
| Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Ms. Sara Jeanne Lathrop for Appellant Neal Walsh. [5224748] [22-3157] (CNL) [Entered: 12/07/2022 11:45 AM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Neal Walsh submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5224658] [22-3157] (SJL) [Entered: 12/07/2022 10:24 AM] |
| Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Neal Walsh. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [5224660] [22-3157] (SJL) [Entered: 12/07/2022 10:25 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - MOTION TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Comments: District Court document #49 [Only Electronic Copy Received - No Paper Copy on File], Source Location: USDC / MN, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 03/09/2022, No. of Pgs.: 53, Court Reporter: Simpson, Lori Ann [5219491] [22-3157] (STL) [Entered: 11/20/2022 06:19 AM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Neal Walsh - Joint Appendix - w/service 11/14/2022 [5217537] [22-3157] (SJL) [Entered: 11/14/2022 12:34 PM] |
| ****DOCUMENT LOCKED****METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Neal Walsh - Joint Appendix - w/service 11/13/2022 [5217314] [22-3157]--[Edited 11/14/2022 by CNL] METHOD OF APPENDIX PREPARATION REFILED WITH CORRECT CAPTION [5217537]. NDA RESENT. (SJL) [Entered: 11/13/2022 10:29 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Sara Lathrop for Appellant Neal Walsh w/service 11/03/2022 [5214437] [22-3157] (SJL) [Entered: 11/03/2022 09:45 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Mark Enslin for Appellant Neal Walsh w/service 11/03/2022 [5214438] [22-3157] (SJL) [Entered: 11/03/2022 09:46 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order on continued sealing 2/14/22, and Order on motions for judgment on the pleadings 9/21/22 [5208993] [22-3157] (MMH) [Entered: 10/18/2022 03:05 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 11/28/2022. Appendix due 12/07/2022. BRIEF APPELLANT, Neal Walsh due 12/07/2022 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5208994] [22-3157] (MMH) [Entered: 10/18/2022 03:06 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5208983] [22-3157] (MMH) [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Florine Ching v. Ofc. Neal Walsh | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: Florine K. Ching, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Travis Matthew Jordan, Decedent | |
| Represented By: | Paul J. Bosman |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Adam Gifford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Minneapolis, in their individual and official capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ofc. Ryan Keyes, in their individual and official capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Police Chief Medaria Arradondo, in their individual and official capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Ofc. Neal Walsh, in their individual and official capacities | |
| Represented By: | Mark S. Enslin |
| Represented By: | Sara Jeanne Lathrop |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
