United States v. Cesar Cortez
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Cesar Cortez
Case Number: 22-3161
Filed: October 19, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 14, 2023 Summary United States v. Cesar Cortez

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2022 On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under Rule 27, certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion to withdraw as appointed counsel, [ # 5209574-2 ], submitted by Mr. Adam Rose in 22-3161 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [22-3161] (CNL) [Entered: 10/20/2022 08:13 AM]
October 20, 2022 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Adam Rose for Appellant Cesar Cortez correcting [ # 5209574-2 ] motion to withdraw as appointed counsel [5209711] [22-3161]--[Edited 10/20/2022 by CNL. Modified to correct docket text. NDA resent.] (AR) [Entered: 10/20/2022 10:16 AM]
October 19, 2022 MOTION to withdraw as appointed counsel, filed by Attorney Mr. Adam Rose for Appellant Cesar Cortez w/service 10/19/2022. [5209574] [22-3161]--[Edited 10/20/2022 by CNL. Modified type of counsel. Attorney Mr. Adam Rose appointed under CJA per October 19, 2022 Clerk Order [5209391]. NDA resent.] (AR) [Entered: 10/19/2022 04:51 PM]
October 19, 2022 CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 11/09/2022. Transcript due 11/09/2022. Brief of appellant Cesar Cortez due 11/23/2022. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [5209395] [22-3161] (CJO) [Entered: 10/19/2022 12:51 PM]
October 19, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Judgment 10/12/2022, Order Denying Motion to Withdraw as Attorney 10/14/2022, and Order Granting IFP 10/17/2022. [5209383] [22-3161] (CJO) [Entered: 10/19/2022 12:41 PM]
October 19, 2022 CLERK ORDER:Appointing Mr. Adam Rose for Cesar Cortez under the Criminal Justice Act. [5209391] [22-3161] (CJO) [Entered: 10/19/2022 12:48 PM]
October 19, 2022 CRIMINAL case docketed. [5209372] [22-3161] (CJO) [Entered: 10/19/2022 12:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States v. Cesar Cortez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Kimberly Nicole Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Cesar Cortez
Represented By: Cesar Cortez
Represented By: Adam Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?