Dilver Gaytan-Parada v. Merrick B. Garland
| Dilver Ezequiel Gaytan-Parada |
| Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of United States |
| 22-3217 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Dilver Gaytan-Parada v. Merrick B. Garland |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE in opposition to motion for stay [ # 5211329-2 ] filed by Attorney Ms. Mona Maria Yousif for Respondent Merrick B. Garland , w/service 10/26/2022. [5211586] [22-3217] (MMY) [Entered: 10/26/2022 09:51 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Mona Maria Yousif for Respondent Merrick B. Garland w/service 10/25/2022 [5211440] [22-3217] (MMY) [Entered: 10/25/2022 03:49 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:directing Mr. Carl H. McIntyre for Merrick B. Garland to file a response to motion for stay, [ # 5211329-2 ]. Merrick B. Garland response due on 11/04/2022 [5211331] [22-3217] (AEV) [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:12 PM] |
| MOTION for stay of removal, filed by Attorney Mr. Joseph Lopez Wilson for Petitioner Mr. Dilver Ezequiel Gaytan-Parada w/service 10/12/2022. [5211329] [22-3217] (AEV) [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:09 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Administrative Record due 12/05/2022. Brief of Dilver Ezequiel Gaytan-Parada due on 12/19/2022. Responsive brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief.[5211324] [22-3217] (AEV) [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:06 PM] |
| PETITION for Review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (By Mail) filed by w/service 10/12/2022 [5211310] [22-3217] (AEV) [Entered: 10/25/2022 01:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
