DeMun Walker v. Paul Blair
Petitioner: DeMun D. Walker
Respondent: Paul Blair, Warden
Case Number: 22-3267
Filed: October 31, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Mr. DeMun D. Walker, w/service 10/31/2022. Response of Paul Blair due 11/14/2022. [5213257] [22-3267] (CJO) [Entered: 10/31/2022 03:44 PM]
October 31, 2022 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5213253] [22-3267] (CJO) [Entered: 10/31/2022 03:42 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: DeMun Walker v. Paul Blair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DeMun D. Walker
Represented By: DeMun D. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Paul Blair, Warden
Represented By: Andrew Crane
Represented By: Habeas Unit Missouri Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?