Manuel Pomavilla-Pichisaca v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
| Manuel Segundo Pomavilla-Pichisaca |
| Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States and Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security |
| 22-3328 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Andrew D. Barr for Petitioner Manuel Segundo Pomavilla-Pichisaca w/service 11/07/2022 [5215823] [22-3328] (AMK) [Entered: 11/07/2022 05:35 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Kimberley A. Bishop for Petitioner Manuel Segundo Pomavilla-Pichisaca w/service 11/07/2022 [5215824] [22-3328] (AMK) [Entered: 11/07/2022 05:38 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Tiana A. Demas for Petitioner Manuel Segundo Pomavilla-Pichisaca w/service 11/07/2022 [5215825] [22-3328] (AMK) [Entered: 11/07/2022 05:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Adam M. Katz for Petitioner Manuel Segundo Pomavilla-Pichisaca w/service 11/07/2022 [5215822] [22-3328] (AMK) [Entered: 11/07/2022 05:34 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Jaclyn G. Hagner for Respondent Merrick B. Garland w/service 11/07/2022 [5215753] [22-3328] (JGH) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:59 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 22-3328: In Forma Pauperis] [5215543] [22-3328] (MMH) [Entered: 11/07/2022 01:54 PM] |
| PETITION for Review of an order of the Dept. of Homeland Security (Electronic) filed by Petitioner Manuel Segundo Pomavilla-Pichisaca w/service 11/07/2022 [5215553] [22-3328] (MMH) [Entered: 11/07/2022 01:57 PM] |
| CONSOLIDATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Administrative Record due 12/19/2022. Brief of Manuel Segundo Pomavilla-Pichisaca due on 01/03/2023. Responsive brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief.[5215584] [22-2350, 22-3328] (MMH) [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:12 PM] |
| Agency case docketed [5215468] [22-3328] (MMH) [Entered: 11/07/2022 12:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Manuel Pomavilla-Pichisaca v. Merrick B. Garland, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Manuel Segundo Pomavilla-Pichisaca | |
| Represented By: | Andrew D. Barr |
| Represented By: | Kimberley A. Bishop |
| Represented By: | Tiana A. Demas |
| Represented By: | Adam M. Katz |
| Represented By: | Charles Roth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States | |
| Represented By: | Peter B. Berg |
| Represented By: | EOIR |
| Represented By: | Jaclyn Georgette Hagner |
| Represented By: | Carl H. McIntyre |
| Represented By: | Oil Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security | |
| Represented By: | Joseph B. Maher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
