Marvel Jones v. John Carter, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marvel Jones
Defendant / Appellee: John M. Carter, sued in their individual and in their official capacities, Timothy Carmichael, sued in their individual and in their official capacities, Jeffrey Howard, sued in their individual and in their official capacities, City of Lincoln and Chief of Lincoln Police Department, sued in their individual and in their official capacities
Case Number: 22-3409
Filed: November 18, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2023 JUDGMENT FILED - The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 5228208-2 ] has been considered and is granted. The full $505 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. Appellant will be permitted to pay the fee by installment method contained in 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(b)(2). The court remands the calculation of the installments and the collection of the fees to the district court. This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, BOBBY E. SHEPHERD and DAVID R. STRAS Adp Jan 2023 [5233541] [22-3409] (NDG) [Entered: 01/06/2023 02:26 PM]
January 5, 2023 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Bobby E. Shepherd, David R. Stras in St. Louis [5233537] [22-3409] (NDG) [Entered: 01/06/2023 02:23 PM]
December 16, 2022 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Party Mr. Marvel Jones, w/service 12/16/2022. [5228208] [22-3409] (CJO) [Entered: 12/16/2022 02:54 PM]
November 18, 2022 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5219233] [22-3409] (CJO) [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:31 AM]
November 18, 2022 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum and Order 09/01/2021, Judgment 09/01/2021, Memorandum and Order 10/18/2022, and Order Denying IFP 11/16/2022. [5219219] [22-3409] (CJO) [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:21 AM]
November 18, 2022 CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 12/16/2022, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5219228] [22-3409] (CJO) [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:28 AM]
November 18, 2022 Prisoner case docketed. [5219203] [22-3409] (CJO) [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:03 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Marvel Jones v. John Carter, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Marvel Jones
Represented By: Marvel Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John M. Carter, sued in their individual and in their official capacities
Represented By: Richard Walter Tast II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Timothy Carmichael, sued in their individual and in their official capacities
Represented By: Richard Walter Tast II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Jeffrey Howard, sued in their individual and in their official capacities
Represented By: Richard Walter Tast II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: City of Lincoln
Represented By: Richard Walter Tast II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Chief of Lincoln Police Department, sued in their individual and in their official capacities
Represented By: Richard Walter Tast II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?