United States v. Xeavier Franklin, Jr.
| United States of America |
| Xeavier James Franklin, Jr. |
| 22-3439 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by MacKenzie Tubbs for Appellee United States of America w/service 11/23/2022 [5220904] [22-3439] (MBT) [Entered: 11/23/2022 01:34 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Brad Hansen for Appellant Xeavier James Franklin, Jr. w/service 11/23/2022 [5220942] [22-3439] (BRH) [Entered: 11/23/2022 02:04 PM] |
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 12/14/2022. Transcript due 12/14/2022. Brief of appellant Xeavier James Franklin Jr. due 12/28/2022. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [5220845] [22-3439] (CJO) [Entered: 11/23/2022 12:04 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [5220841] [22-3439] (CJO) [Entered: 11/23/2022 12:01 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Report and Recommendation 07/06/2022, Order Accepting Report and Recommendation 07/22/2022, and Judgment 11/09/2022.[5220838] [22-3439] (CJO) [Entered: 11/23/2022 11:58 AM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5220833] [22-3439] (CJO) [Entered: 11/23/2022 11:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
