Nicholas Brunts v. Walmart, Inc.
| Walmart, Inc. |
| Nicholas Brunts, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| 22-8020 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PETITION for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1453(c) (Electronic) filed by Petitioner Walmart, Inc. w/service 12/23/2022. [5230016] [22-8020] (CMH) [Entered: 12/23/2022 09:18 AM] |
| Miscellaneous case docketed. [5230014] [22-8020] (CMH) [Entered: 12/23/2022 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Nicholas Brunts v. Walmart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Nicholas Brunts, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Daniel F. Harvath |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Walmart, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Kevin Underhill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
